Warning: Undefined array key "HTTP_REFERER" in /www/wwwroot/prod/www.enjoyasp.net/wp-content/plugins/google-highlight/google-hilite.php on line 58
When looking at the wait statistics being tracked by SQL Server, it's important that these wait types are eliminated from the analysis, allowing the more problematic waits in the system to be identified. One of the things I do as a part of tracking wait information is to maintain a script that filters out the non-problematic wait types, as shown in Listing 1.2.' Troubleshooting SQL Server A Guide for the Accidental DBA --1,wait types,if for i/o,then sys.dm_io_virtual_file_stats --2,sqlserver perfmon counts view SELECT TOP 10 wait_type , max_wait_time_ms wait_time_ms , signal_wait_time_ms , wait_time_ms - signal_wait_time_ms AS resource_wait_time_ms , 100.0 * wait_time_ms / SUM(wait_time_ms) OVER ( ) AS percent_total_waits , 100.0 * signal_wait_time_ms / NULLIF(SUM(signal_wait_time_ms) OVER ( ),0) AS percent_total_signal_waits , 100.0 * ( wait_time_ms - signal_wait_time_ms ) / SUM(wait_time_ms) OVER ( ) AS percent_total_resource_waits FROM sys.dm_os_wait_stats WHERE wait_time_ms > 0 -- remove zero wait_time AND wait_type NOT IN -- filter out additional irrelevant waits ( 'SLEEP_TASK', 'BROKER_TASK_STOP', 'BROKER_TO_FLUSH', 'SQLTRACE_BUFFER_FLUSH','CLR_AUTO_EVENT', 'CLR_MANUAL_EVENT', 'LAZYWRITER_SLEEP', 'SLEEP_SYSTEMTASK', 'SLEEP_BPOOL_FLUSH', 'BROKER_EVENTHANDLER', 'XE_DISPATCHER_WAIT', 'FT_IFTSHC_MUTEX', 'CHECKPOINT_QUEUE', 'FT_IFTS_SCHEDULER_IDLE_WAIT', 'BROKER_TRANSMITTER', 'FT_IFTSHC_MUTEX', 'KSOURCE_WAKEUP', 'LAZYWRITER_SLEEP', 'LOGMGR_QUEUE', 'ONDEMAND_TASK_QUEUE', 'REQUEST_FOR_DEADLOCK_SEARCH', 'XE_TIMER_EVENT', 'BAD_PAGE_PROCESS', 'DBMIRROR_EVENTS_QUEUE', 'BROKER_RECEIVE_WAITFOR', 'PREEMPTIVE_OS_GETPROCADDRESS', 'PREEMPTIVE_OS_AUTHENTICATIONOPS', 'WAITFOR', 'DISPATCHER_QUEUE_SEMAPHORE', 'XE_DISPATCHER_JOIN', 'RESOURCE_QUEUE' ) ORDER BY wait_time_ms DESC CXPACKET Often indicates nothing more than that certain queries are executing with parallelism; CXPACKET waits in the server are not an immediate sign of problems SOS_SCHEDULER_YIELD This may indicate that the server is under CPU press THREADPOOL requiring an increase in the number of CPUs in the server, to handle a highly concurrent workload, or it can be a sign of blocking LCK_* These wait types signify that blocking is occurring in the system and that sessions have had to wait to acquire a lock of a specific typ This problem can be investigated further using the information in the sys.dm_db_index_operational_stats PAGEIOLATCH_*, IO_COMPLETION, WRITELOG These waits are commonly associated with disk I/O bottlenecks, though the root cause of the problem may be,PAGEIOLATCH_* waits are specifically associated with delays in being able to read or write data from the database files. WRITELOG waits are related to issues with writing to log files. These waits should be evaluated in conjunction with the virtual file statistics as well as Physical Disk performance counters PAGELATCH_* A lot of times PAGELATCH_* waits are associated with allocation contention issues. One of the best-known allocations issues associated with PAGELATCH_* waits occurs in tempdb when the a large number of objects are being created and destroyed in tempdb and the system experiences contention on the Shared Global Allocation Map (SGAM), Global Allocation Map (GAM), and Page Free Space (PFS) pages in the tempdb database. LATCH_* Determining the specific latch class that has the most accumulated wait time associated with it can be found by querying the sys.dm_os_latch_stats DMV. ASYNC_NETWORK_IO This wait is often incorrectly attributed to a network bottleneck,In fact, the most common cause of this wait is a client application that is performing row-by-row processing of the data being streamed from SQL Server as a result set (client accepts one row, processes, accepts next row, and so on). Correcting this wait type generally requires changing the client-side code so that it reads the result set as fast as possible, and then performs processing After fixing any problem in the server, in order to validate that the problem has indeed been fixed, the wait statistics being tracked by the server can be reset using the code in Listing 1.3. DBCC SQLPERF('sys.dm_os_wait_stats', clear) --------------disk I/O bottleneck.----------- will provide cumulative physical I/O statistics, the number of reads and writes on each data file, and the number of reads and writes on each log file, for the various databases in the instance, from which can be calculated the ratio of reads to writes. This also shows the number of I/O stalls and the stall time associated with the requests, which is the total amount of time sessions have waited for I/O to be completed on the file. whether heavy-read or heavy-write, and at the average latency associated with the I/O, as this will direct further investigation and possible solutions. SELECT DB_NAME(vfs.database_id) AS database_name , vfs.database_id , vfs.FILE_ID , io_stall_read_ms / NULLIF(num_of_reads, 0) AS avg_read_latency , io_stall_write_ms / NULLIF(num_of_writes, 0) AS avg_write_latency , io_stall / NULLIF(num_of_reads + num_of_writes, 0) AS avg_total_latency , num_of_bytes_read / NULLIF(num_of_reads, 0) AS avg_bytes_per_read , num_of_bytes_written / NULLIF(num_of_writes, 0) AS avg_bytes_per_write , vfs.io_stall , vfs.num_of_reads , vfs.num_of_bytes_read , vfs.io_stall_read_ms , vfs.num_of_writes , vfs.num_of_bytes_written , vfs.io_stall_write_ms , size_on_disk_bytes / 1024 / 1024. AS size_on_disk_mbytes , physical_name FROM sys.dm_io_virtual_file_stats(NULL, NULL) AS vfs JOIN sys.master_files AS mf ON vfs.database_id = mf.database_id AND vfs.FILE_ID = mf.FILE_ID ORDER BY avg_total_latency DESC SELECT * FROM sys.dm_os_performance_counters DECLARE @CounterPrefix NVARCHAR(30) SET @CounterPrefix = CASE WHEN @@SERVICENAME = 'MSSQLSERVER' THEN 'SQLServer:' ELSE 'MSSQL$' + @@SERVICENAME + ':' END ; -- Capture the first counter set SELECT CAST(1 AS INT) AS collection_instance , [OBJECT_NAME] , counter_name , instance_name , cntr_value , cntr_type , CURRENT_TIMESTAMP AS collection_time INTO #perf_counters_init FROM sys.dm_os_performance_counters WHERE ( OBJECT_NAME = @CounterPrefix + 'Access Methods' AND counter_name = 'Full Scans/sec' ) OR ( OBJECT_NAME = @CounterPrefix + 'Access Methods' AND counter_name = 'Index Searches/sec' ) OR ( OBJECT_NAME = @CounterPrefix + 'Buffer Manager' AND counter_name = 'Lazy Writes/sec' ) OR ( OBJECT_NAME = @CounterPrefix + 'Buffer Manager' AND counter_name = 'Page life expectancy' ) OR ( OBJECT_NAME = @CounterPrefix + 'General Statistics' AND counter_name = 'Processes Blocked' ) OR ( OBJECT_NAME = @CounterPrefix + 'General Statistics' AND counter_name = 'User Connections' ) OR ( OBJECT_NAME = @CounterPrefix + 'Locks' AND counter_name = 'Lock Waits/sec' ) OR ( OBJECT_NAME = @CounterPrefix + 'Locks' AND counter_name = 'Lock Wait Time (ms)' ) OR ( OBJECT_NAME = @CounterPrefix + 'SQL Statistics' AND counter_name = 'SQL Re-Compilations/sec' ) OR ( OBJECT_NAME = @CounterPrefix + 'Memory Manager' AND counter_name = 'Memory Grants Pending' ) OR ( OBJECT_NAME = @CounterPrefix + 'SQL Statistics' AND counter_name = 'Batch Requests/sec' ) OR ( OBJECT_NAME = @CounterPrefix + 'SQL Statistics' AND counter_name = 'SQL Compilations/sec' ) -- Wait on Second between data collection WAITFOR DELAY '00:00:01' -- Capture the second counter set SELECT CAST(2 AS INT) AS collection_instance , OBJECT_NAME , counter_name , instance_name , cntr_value , cntr_type , CURRENT_TIMESTAMP AS collection_time INTO #perf_counters_second FROM sys.dm_os_performance_counters WHERE ( OBJECT_NAME = @CounterPrefix + 'Access Methods' AND counter_name = 'Full Scans/sec' ) OR ( OBJECT_NAME = @CounterPrefix + 'Access Methods' AND counter_name = 'Index Searches/sec' ) OR ( OBJECT_NAME = @CounterPrefix + 'Buffer Manager' AND counter_name = 'Lazy Writes/sec' ) OR ( OBJECT_NAME = @CounterPrefix + 'Buffer Manager' AND counter_name = 'Page life expectancy' ) OR ( OBJECT_NAME = @CounterPrefix + 'General Statistics' AND counter_name = 'Processes Blocked' ) OR ( OBJECT_NAME = @CounterPrefix + 'General Statistics' AND counter_name = 'User Connections' ) OR ( OBJECT_NAME = @CounterPrefix + 'Locks' AND counter_name = 'Lock Waits/sec' ) OR ( OBJECT_NAME = @CounterPrefix + 'Locks' AND counter_name = 'Lock Wait Time (ms)' ) OR ( OBJECT_NAME = @CounterPrefix + 'SQL Statistics' AND counter_name = 'SQL Re-Compilations/sec' ) OR ( OBJECT_NAME = @CounterPrefix + 'Memory Manager' AND counter_name = 'Memory Grants Pending' ) OR ( OBJECT_NAME = @CounterPrefix + 'SQL Statistics' AND counter_name = 'Batch Requests/sec' ) OR ( OBJECT_NAME = @CounterPrefix + 'SQL Statistics' AND counter_name = 'SQL Compilations/sec' ) -- Calculate the cumulative counter values SELECT i.OBJECT_NAME , i.counter_name , i.instance_name , CASE WHEN i.cntr_type = 272696576 THEN s.cntr_value - i.cntr_value WHEN i.cntr_type = 65792 THEN s.cntr_value END AS cntr_value FROM #perf_counters_init AS i JOIN #perf_counters_second AS s ON i.collection_instance + 1 = s.collection_instance AND i.OBJECT_NAME = s.OBJECT_NAME AND i.counter_name = s.counter_name AND i.instance_name = s.instance_name ORDER BY OBJECT_NAME -- Cleanup tables DROP TABLE #perf_counters_init DROP TABLE #perf_counters_second The two Access Methods counters provide information about the ways that tables are being accessed in the database. The most important one is the Full Scans/sec counter, which can give us an idea of the number of index and table scans that are occurring in the SYSTEM In general, I want the number of Index Searches/sec to be higher than the number of Full Scans/sec by a factor of 800–1000. If the number of Full Scans/sec is too high, refer to Chapter 5, Missing Indexes to determine if there are missing indexes in the database, resulting in excess I/O operations. Page Life Expectancy (PLE) which is the number of seconds a page will remain in the data cache the question VALUE <= (max server memory/4)*300s, Writes/sec, which are page flushes from the buffer cache outside of the normal CHECKPOINT process, then the server is most likely experiencing data cache memory pressure, which will also increase the disk I/O being performed by the SQL SERVER,At this point the Access Methods counters should be investigated to determine if excessive table or index scans are being performed on the SQL SERVER The General Statistics\Processes Blocked, Locks\Lock Waits/sec, If these counters return a value other than zero, over repeated collections of the data, then blocking is actively occurring in one of the databases , Blocking should be used to troubleshoot the problems further sp_configure ('show advanced options') The higher the number of SQL Compilations/ sec in relation to the Batch Requests/sec, the more likely the SQL Server is experiencing an ad hoc workload that is not making optimal using of plan caching. The higher the number of SQL Re-Compilations/sec in relation to the Batch Requests/ sec, the more likely it is that there is an inefficiency in the code design that is forcing a recompile of the code being executed in the SQL Server. In either case, investigation of the Plan Cache show advanced options The Memory Manager\Memory Grants Pending performance counter provides information about the number of processes waiting on a workspace memory grant in the instance.If this counter has a high value,there may be query inefficiencies in the instance that are causing excessive memory grant requirements, for example, large sorts or hashes that can be resolved by tuning the indexing or queries being executed